Labor & Employment Topic Archive
- Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (11)
- Arbitration Agreements (9)
- Collective Bargaining (5)
- Deliberate Intent (3)
- Discipline and Discharge (9)
- Discrimination (Title VII / EEO) (33)
- Electronic Workplace (7)
- Employee Benefits/ERISA (7)
- Employee Privacy (2)
- Employment Handbooks/Policies (16)
- Ethics (3)
- Family & Medical Leave Act (FMLA) (7)
- General Employer Interest (141)
- Harassment (10)
- Hiring (8)
- Human Relations (22)
- Immigration (2)
- Labor Relations/NLRB (46)
- Occupational Safety & Health (OSHA) (8)
- Social Networking (8)
- Technology (5)
- USERRA (3)
- Vanessa's Views (23)
- Wage and Hour (23)
- Workers’ Compensation (11)
Labor & Employment Links
- Code of Federal Regulations
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- LexisNexis Labor & Employment Law Community
- National Labor Relations Board
- Ohio Civil Rights Commission
- Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
- Society of Human Resource Management
- United States Department of Labor
- West Virginia Human Rights Commission
Steptoe & Johnson Links
Steptoe & Johnson Recent NewsArchives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
James Heslep focuses his practice in the defense of workplace injuries and illnesses and allegations of workplace safety violations.» See more articles by James W. Heslep
» Read the full biography of James W. Heslep at Steptoe & Johnson
» Meet the team behind the Employment Essentials blog









WORKPLACE SAFETY IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER SHOOTING
The Bureau of Labor Statistics recently reported that more than two million American workers are victims of workplace violence each year. In fact, homicide currently ranks as the fourth-leading cause of workplace fatalities in the United States. Recently, a psychiatric clinic associated with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) unexpectedly, and unfortunately, became involved in these statistics.
Sadly, this clinic is not alone. Workplace violence has become such a common cause of occupational injury and fatality that OSHA recently announced a new directive to protect employees from violence at work. Certain industries in particular – including retail, healthcare, and social services – bear the brunt of most workplace violence and are likely to be frequent targets for the recent OSHA directives regarding the prevention of workplace violence.
OSHA has recommended that employers look at both administrative and engineering controls to make their workplaces safer. Administrative controls include consideration of work hours and local trends in crime that might provide some clues as to when, where, or how violence is likely to occur at a particular facility. Likewise, retaining trained safety personnel could be an administrative control implemented to minimize workplace violence. Engineering controls include physical safety provisions like electronic door locks, safety partitions, and surveillance equipment. OSHA naturally recommends that reporting and training components be made a part of any workplace safety program, as well.
It is important for employers to be aware that future OSHA inspections could likely include a review of programs meant to stem workplace violence. It is also important to note that instances of workplace violence are the source of compensable workers’ compensation injuries. In some states, workers just observing an act of violence in the workplace are entitled to workers’ compensation benefits for any psychiatric impacts such events can trigger. And, in cases where employers had experienced prior acts of violence at their facilities and failed to take steps to control future occurrences, civil liability can be assigned to the employer if its employees are subsequently injured.
Undeniably for UMPC – at the terrible expense of 7 dead individuals – this risk of future liability has now grown. Lessons can and should be learned for all employers as a consequence of this unfortunate tragedy.