Labor & Employment Topic Archive
- Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (6)
- Arbitration Agreements (5)
- Collective Bargaining (2)
- Deliberate Intent (2)
- Discipline and Discharge (9)
- Discrimination (Title VII / EEO) (29)
- Electronic Workplace (5)
- Employee Benefits/ERISA (5)
- Employee Privacy (3)
- Employment Handbooks/Policies (10)
- Ethics (4)
- Family & Medical Leave Act (FMLA) (4)
- General Employer Interest (94)
- Harassment (10)
- Hiring (8)
- Human Relations (18)
- Immigration (2)
- Labor Relations (28)
- Occupational Safety & Health (OSHA) (7)
- Social Networking (7)
- Technology (5)
- USERRA (2)
- Vanessa's Views (6)
- Wage and Hour (19)
- Workers’ Compensation (8)
Labor & Employment Links
- Code of Federal Regulations
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- LexisNexis Labor & Employment Law Community
- National Labor Relations Board
- Ohio Civil Rights Commission
- Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
- Society of Human Resource Management
- United States Department of Labor
- West Virginia Human Rights Commission
Steptoe & Johnson Links
Steptoe & Johnson Recent News- Gene Jazwinski Joins Steptoe & Johnson May 16, 2012
- PA PUC Issues Order for Unconventional Well Impact Fees May 15, 2012
- WV Legislative Update - 5/11/12 May 11, 2012
- Land Management Bureau Issues Fracing Regs for Public Lands May 9, 2012
- Jim Wright Sworn in as WV State Bar President May 9, 2012
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
J. A. Curia represents clients in labor and employment litigation in state and federal courts.» See more articles by J. A. Curia III
» Read the full biography of J. A. Curia III at Steptoe & Johnson
» Meet the team behind the Employment Essentials blog








BIG WEEK FOR THE NLRB: SUPREME COURT DECISION CALLS INTO DOUBT OVER 500 DECISIONS AND GENERAL COUNSEL RESIGNS
The National Labor Relations Board is a federal agency that, among other things, resolves cases involving alleged unfair labor practices by employers and unions. The Board generally has five members, all of whom are appointed by the President. Due in large part to political disagreements, however, the Board operated with only two members from January of 2008 to late March of 2010. In that 27 month time span, the two-member Board issued over 500 decisions.
On June 17, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of New Process Steel v. National Labor Relations Board that arguably re-opens all of the decisions issued by the two-member Board. More specifically, the Supreme Court held that a two-member Board lacked the authority to resolve cases because a Board comprised of only two members was not a quorum — at least three members of the Board needed to present for the Board to properly act.
So what does that mean? The impact of the decision is not entirely clear. For the two-member Board decisions that are not yet final, such as those on appeal (a Board press release estimates that approximately 75 decisions are on appeal), they would simply be vacated and remanded for a de novo review by a properly constituted Board. A trickier question arises for all of the two-member Board decisions that are now final. If challenged, they would seemingly also have to be reopened in light of the Supreme Court’s decision; and, even if those final decisions are not challenged, the Supreme Court’s decision then creates an issue as to whether or not the two-member Board’s decisions have any precedential effect.
In addition to the numerous issues created by the Supreme Court’s ruling, one day after this decision was released by the Supreme Court, the Board’s General Counsel’s resignation became effective. This creates another vacancy that will have to be filled by President Obama. The General Counsel’s appointment will be of significance as the General Counsel plays a large role in setting the agenda of cases that come before the Board.
As a final note, commentators viewed many decisions by the two-member Board, which consisted of one Democrat and one Republican, to be of little significance. Going forward, as President Obama fills the Board, it remains to be seen if the Board and its General Counsel will seek out significant issues and if it will move in a decidedly pro-labor direction as many predicted with the election of President Obama.
The entire Supreme Court decision can be found at:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/08-1457.ZO.html